This Week in South Sudan – Week 34

Monday 18 August

Tuesday 19 August

Wednesday 20 August

Thursday 21 August

Friday 22 August

Saturday 23 August

Sunday 24 August

This Week in South Sudan – Week 33

Monday 11 August

Tuesday 12 August

Wednesday 13 August

Thursday 14 August

Friday 15 August

Saturday 16 August

Sunday 17 August

State Briefing: Warrap State

  • Capital: KuajokWarrap State
  • Approximate Population: 972,928.
  • Internally Diplaced People (IDP) sheltering in the state: 8,800

Warrap State is located in the north of South Sudan, in the Greater Bahr el-Ghazal region. Warrap borders Abyei, a contested area between Sudan and South Sudan. The majority of Warrap’s inhabitants are Dinka, but Luo, Bongo and other smaller ethnic groups also live there.

The political elite of Warrap overwhelmingly support President Salva Kiir and his government, and there have been few, if any, defections from the SPLA within this state. In January, state politicians and civil society leaders issued a letter of support for Salva Kiir’s government and condemned the actions of Riek Machar’s faction. More recently Warrap political leaders spoke in favour of the government position in the debate over federalism in South Sudan. The only disorder in the ranks was caused by the information minister who was accused of having links to the opposition. She resigned in February.

Warrap has not been spared from violence, however. Since the signing of peace in 2005, cattle raiding and local revenge feuds have claimed hundreds of lives, especially along the Unity-Warrap state border. During the current conflict, the brutality of these raids seems to have increased. In January more than forty people were killed in two raids in the Tonj area. In one incident in March, seven people were killed and 300 cattle stolen. In April, fighting on the Unity-Warrap border left more than ten people dead, and in Tuic County sixteen people were reportedly killed, including fourteen women. The state capital, Kuajok, has not been a target of raids, but the city has experienced protests and heavy gunfire over salary disputes.

The number of registered Internally Displaced People (IDP) in Warrap is 8,800, many of which are hailing from Unity State. About 4,000 of the IDPs are located in Tuic County, one of the areas suffering from frequent raids. This is a smaller number than in the states hardest hit by the civil war violence, but the IDPs still put pressure on scarce resources.  Already when the first IDPs arrived, state officials warned about increasing malnutrition  and the overall condition in the Turalei camp continues to be difficult. In June hospitals lacked medicines and there is a severe food shortage among IDPs as well as the host population.

This Week in South Sudan – Week 32

Monday 4 August

Tuesday 5 August

Wednesday 6 August

Thursday 7 August

Friday 8 August

Saturday 9 August

Sunday 10 August

This Week in South Sudan – Week 31

Monday 28 July

Tuesday 29 July

Wednesday 30 July

Thursday 31 July

Friday 1 August

Saturday 2 August

Sunday 3 August

State Briefing: Unity State

  • Capital: Bentiu
  • Approximate Population: 585,801
  • Internally Displaced People (IDP) sheltering in the state: 265,500

Unity State map (2)

While parts of South Sudan have been relatively calm in July, Unity State is still severely insecure.  In the last two weeks the agreement on cessation of hostilities has been violated by clashes between the SPLA and the SPLA-in-Opposition (SPLAiO) in Kuergueyni, Guit, Nhialdiu and Wichok.

Unity State is situated on the west side of the White Nile and borders the Sudanese state of South Kordofan to the North.  The current civil war reached Unity State  on 19 December 2013 when Major General James Koang Chuol defected to the opposition, and two days later he declared himself Governor. The subsequent fighting in different military barracks also affected civilians as the military quarters hosted soldiers’ families and other civilians.

Because of its oil reserves and production facilities, Unity is strategically important to the warring parties and the compound of the Greater Pioneer Operation Company (GPOC) was attacked during the first day of the conflict. Oil revenues are essential for keeping the South Sudanese government afloat and any long-term shut-down of production would have grave consequences for the future of the country. In the extension of the UNMISS mandate 27 May, oil installations were identified to be in need of special protection. As a result, UNMISS has been criticised for prioritising international companies’ oil assets over South Sudanese civilians. However, UNMISS maintains that their purpose is to protect the workers and their families in the oilfields.

SPLAiO seized the state capital, Bentiu 20-21 December, but SPLA recaptured the city in January. With the capital under their control, the SPLA moved south and fought the rebels in Koch, Leer and Panyijar counties. The battle over Leer, Riek Machar’s home county, was particularly devastating; Leer’s hospital was destroyed and 40,000  civilians who were seeking refuge in the city were again forced to flee. In the west, the warring parties laid waste to Mayom county. The Cessation of Hostilities Agreement, signed in late January, did little to stop the civil war. In April Bentiu was destroyed after it again was seized by SPLAiO.  Hate speech was broadcasted on the radio and many civilians were killed, including more than 200 Darfurian civilians, sheltered in a mosque. The UN called this massacre a “game-changer”. In May, SPLA again took control over Bentiu and the state capital has been in government hands since then.

Unity State’s proximity to Sudan and the various armed groups on both sides of the border further complicate the situation. Parts of the Sudanese opposition group Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) sided with the SPLA in December 2013, but has denied any participation in violence in 2014. Moreover, JEM blamed the Government of Sudan (GoS) for the killing of Darfurians in Bentiu. Meanwhile the Government of South Sudan has accused Sudan government forces of assisting the SPLAiO. Tensions between the two countries increased further when Sudan in April dropped bombs outside Neem village close to Yida refugee camp in Pariang county.

There are more than 80,000 Sudanese refugees in Unity State who has fled from the civil war in South Kordofan and the UNMISS Protection of Civilian site (PoC) in Bentiu, the largest in South Sudan, shelters 40,574 people.  UNMISS is concerned over the squalid conditions in the camp. Despite the fact that about 150 people move to Sudan every day, the camp still lacks capacity to accommodate the daily intake of displaced people. UNMISS is planning a new Bentiu site, but as the rainy season makes transport and supply provision difficult, it is uncertain when it will be finished.

 

This Week in South Sudan – Week 30

Monday 21 July

Tuesday 22 July

Wednesday 23 July

Thursday 24 July

Friday 25 July

Saturday 26 July

 Sunday 27 July

Helping or Hindering? The Impact of Civil Society Groups in the Peace Negotiations

South Sudan’s unresolved civil war dampened celebrations on its third Independence Day on 9 July 2014. Despite the urgent need for peace, the negotiation process has yet to yield a resolution. Since the signing of the recommitment to the cessation of hostilities in May 2014, progress has occurred, though with ambiguous outcomes. For example, although necessary, the attempt to include Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) has complicated the peace negotiations further.

From March to May 2014, IGAD consulted with South Sudanese CSOs to help develop a modality for their participation in the peace negotiations. This was done in preparation for the Multi-Stakeholder Symposium hosted in Addis Ababa on 4-9 June 2014. The consultation resulted in a strict selection process through which a broadly composed delegation of nineteen independent representatives received a mandate to attend the Symposium. However, the two warring parties respectively brought representatives of other CSOs to the Symposium in June. None of these new CSOs had participated in the rigorous IGAD selection process and their impartiality was in question since the method used for selecting them was not revealed. Thus, tensions unsurprisingly ensued.

Furthermore, the majority of these new CSOs operate in government-controlled territories and the SPLM-in-Opposition (SPLMiO) suspected them to be in alignment with the Government of South Sudan (GOSS). By contrast, CSOs sympathising with the rebels claimed to be purposely delayed from attending by authorities in Juba, but even upon arrival these delegates protested that they were outnumbered by the representatives of CSOs that arrived with GOSS.

Despite these controversies, the Symposium concluded with an additional ad hoc selection process. IGAD representatives requested that the various CSO delegates, now numbering 40 (comprising of the independent nineteen and the delegates that accompanied the two factions), choose seven representatives in total to participate in the peace process. From the original group of nineteen, which had been elected in an open process, only one was elected as a representative in this new group of seven. The CSOs involved in the first strict selection round expressed concern about their effective exclusion form the peace process. South Sudanese MPs have since also questioned the composition of the stakeholders at the peace talks.

After the Symposium, the peace negotiations continued, culminating in Salva Kiir and Riek Machar agreeing on 10 June 2014 to set a 60-day deadline for the establishment of a transitional government of national unity, to allow humanitarian workers immediate access to people in need, and to a permanent ceasefire.

While the 9 August deadline looms, minor distractions draw attention away from the core issues of the conflict: i.e. the struggle over political leadership in the SPLM and the SPLA’s lack of cohesion. For instance the talks in June were postponed as both warring parties were affronted by Mahboub Maalim, the executive secretary of IGAD, who said that both leaders were “stupid” if they think they can win on the battlefield. This incident represents an unfortunate diplomatic faux pas for IGAD, but it also reveals how the two parties use various pretexts to avoid committing fully to the talks.

After a delay, on 20 June 2014, IGAD launched another round of negotiations bringing together, for the first time, the SPLM Leaders (former political detainees, SPLM-FD), other political parties, CSO representatives and religious leaders to meet alongside GOSS and SPLMiO. But, the talks were halted indefinitely on 23 June 2014 due to the SPLMiO’s refusal to participate.

The SPLMiO objected to the new framework which they believed would undermine the current mediation process. Moreover, the SPLMiO complains that it was not consulted about these changes or about the selection of the participating CSOs, and also perceived IGAD to be unresponsive to its misgivings. It stated that it would prefer to negotiate exclusively with the GOSS and only consult with other stakeholders. Meanwhile, GOSS denied that it influenced the selection of the civil society groups in question.

It remains unclear whether GOSS and IGAD will agree to reframe the fourth round of negotiations into bilateral talks. IGAD stated that it would use the period of adjournment to consult with a variety of South Sudanese stakeholders as well as international organizations such as the African Union and the United Nations.

While inclusivity is necessary for sustainable peace, the complicated process hitherto has illustrated the challenges of defining genuine stakeholders and of designing a representative system. Moving forward, the addition of participants in sensitive aspects of the process may increase the likelihood of distractions and inadvertently delay a permanent ceasefire. Developments over past months suggest that the calculus of peace in South Sudan requires a simple design and a narrowly focused set of issues for negotiation.

 

Sebabatso Manoeli, PhD student, St. Antony’s College, Oxford University and Øystein H. Rolandsen, senior researcher PRIO.

 

This Week in South Sudan – Week 29

Monday 14 July

Tuesday 15 July

Wednesday 16 July

Thursday 17 July

Friday 18 July

Saturday 19 July

Sunday 20 July

 

This Week in South Sudan – Week 28

Monday 7 July

Tuesday 8 July

Wednesday 9 July

Thursday 10 July

Friday 11 July

Saturday 12 July

Sunday 13 July